🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year went for Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200K ballots left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.