🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental attacks on liberty have effectively abolished the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being defended by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic assault on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," commented a well-known American author, a statement that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were labeled as radicals in their era, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have prompted the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and back the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable anti-Jewish attack to attempt to suppress a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to take action.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can suggest that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have hardly hidden the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of racism in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for holding signs against genocide and supporting the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president described such demonstrations as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears struggled, suffered and died to establish our liberties. We may ultimately rue how easily we allowed them to be eroded.